The suspicion of lost seized items and the information leakage issue are not merely isolated incidents.
The global union pointed out that this response has the potential to "collapse the very premise of inspection administration," and is showing readiness to step up to nationwide action.
What is particularly noteworthy in this case isthe formation process of the face-to-face survey itselfis.
According to the association, there was a case this time where an in-person investigation was agreed to in a capacity that was neither that of a counterpart to a cross-check investigation nor that of a witness, and they say this handling has the potential to significantly deviate from the framework of conventional inspections and audits.
Regarding this point, the Global Union raises the following issues.
- If face-to-face surveys are established on a voluntary basis
- Can't anyone request an in-person audit by the national tax authority?
- In that case, how does the government ensure fairness?
Furthermore, in this case, another union member's credit card was seized, and despite suspicions of unauthorized use during the seizure period, it is stated that "no clear response has been provided regarding the implementation of an investigation."
Regarding this, our union
- Duty to preserve evidence
- duty of care of a prudent manager
From the perspective of, it is pointed out that an obligation to investigate may exist for the National Tax Agency.
And what this case symbolizes is not merely an isolated scandal,
It is a systemic issue spanning across evidence management, information control, and investigative procedures.
is that
Global unions will, in the future,
- Demand for face-to-face surveys on a scale of 250,000 out of 400,000 union members
- collective response based on the constitutional right to organize
- Continuous raising of issues toward ensuring transparency in inspection administration
has clarified its policy to proceed with
Last
This case concerns whether trust in inspection administration will be institutionally maintained,
or it is a turning point depending on whether it fluctuates due to individual operation.
A mass action of 250,000 people is thrusting that question upon society.
The Global Union to Kumamoto Regional Taxation Bureau Director Atsushi Kitamura, Third Inspection Division officials Hiroshi Oka and Keisuke Ota, and Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau Inspection Division 21 official Hideto Nakamura,Demand for conducting face-to-face surveys by mobilizing all union membersto do
